Page 23 - GUIDELINES FOR FOOD SYSTEMS ISSUES PRIORITIZATION, ACTOR AND ACTION MAPPING at sub-national levels in Vietnam
P. 23

Table 2. Proposed criteria and scales for scoring food systems issues at
          the provincial level



                                                Criteria

          Criteria   Criterion 1:   Criterion 2:   Criterion 3:   Criterion 4:   Criterion 5:
          name     Multidisciplinary:  Urgency:   Affected groups:   Policy alignment:  Action priority
                   Is this food    Is this food   Does this food   Is issue related/   and coordination:
                   systems issue   system issue   systems issue   mentioned in   Will this food
                   multi-sectoral at   urgent to be   affect many   the province’s   systems issue
                   the province level?  solved at   different groups in   development   be identified and
                                   the province   the province?  policies, strategies,  planned to be
                                   level?                     plans?          solved by your
                                                                              agency/unit and
                                                                              other units in the
                                                                              near future?


          Scoring  1 = 1 sector    1 = Not     1 = 1 affected   1 = 1 program/   1 = The issue has
                                   urgent, not   group        plan            not been resolved
                   2 = 2 sectors   yet solved                                 by your agency
                                               2 = 2 affected   2 = 2 programs/
                   3 = 3 sectors   2 = less    groups         plans           2= The problem
                                   urgent,                                    has not been
                                   solvable                                   solved but has
                   4= 4 or more                3 = 3 affected   3 = 3 programs/   the potential to be
                   sectors                     groups         plan            included in the plan
                                   3 = urgent,
                                   needs to be   4 = 4 or more   4 = 4 or more
                                   addressed   affected groups  programs, plans  3= The issue is/will
                                                                              be solved by your
                                   4 = very                                   agency
                                   urgent, it
                                   needs to                                   4 = The issue is/
                                   be solved                                  will be solved by
                                   immediately                                your agency in
                                                                              coordination with
                                                                              other agencies


          During the plenary discussion of the stakeholder consultation workshop, the criteria will
          be reviewed thoroughly by the participating stakeholders.


             •   The  group presents the  proposed criteria, scoring methodology,  and related
                 materials in a 10-minute technical session.

             •   Participants then engage in a  plenary discussion, addressing key  questions
                 about the criteria, scoring method, and proposed revisions, such as: (i) Do you
                 have any comments on the criteria and the scoring methods? (ii) Can you please
                 provide information clarifying the proposed changes in the criteria and scales?




          22  Guidelines for food systems issues prioritization, actor and action mapping at subnational levels in Vietnam
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28